Most AI automation flows one way: absorb from the world, route the output back to you. Morning briefings, meeting follow-ups, data analysis. All of it makes you faster. But it only makes *you* faster.

Your team still pings you for the same things they always have — bug reviews, design feedback, roadmap questions. Your judgment is stuck inside your head, behind a calendar.

Your expertise is a bottleneck until you externalize it.

If you always ask the same three questions when reviewing a bug, that's a skill waiting to be built. Engineers get your take as a first pass, without the Slack message, the async thread, the 30-minute sync. You still shaped the answer. It just didn't cost you time.

Candidate eval. Design review. Prototype feedback. Onboarding new hires. Anywhere you find yourself saying the same thing for the tenth time — that's where your leverage is hiding.

Automating yourself was phase one. The real move is pushing your intelligence out. Make everyone around you smarter without showing up. Then push your team to do the same. The time they get back is where the next good idea comes from.

The good news is you're closer than you think. The rubrics, feedback, review comments, and decision criteria you already write down — that's a skill waiting to be packaged. Point Claude at your notes, transcripts, Notion pages, Google Docs and ask it to spot the patterns.

agentskills.io has the spec, skills.sh has examples.

What I am about to ask requires the most human things among us. Courage. And the belief that you will still have worth after you find out what the machine can do.

You will remember Thomas. He apprenticed under a master weaver in Lancaster for three years. Learned the patterns, the dyes, the business of cloth. He is now hauling coal in the rail yards outside Philadelphia. The mills are hiring. Everything is fine.

The skilled tradesmen were supposed to be the safe ones. But it is the artisans being hit harder than the field laborers when the market softens. That is what catches your attention. Not the patent filings. Not the speeches from factory owners.

Arkwright did not ask permission when he moved production off the cottage floor and into the mill. He was confirming what people inside the trade already knew. Then there is Cartwright and the power loom: he spent years declaring the hand-weaver finished, a claim that later got tangled up in something more complicated. Visionary or a man selling futures he could not deliver? The Parliamentary reports and the pamphlets from Manchester do not resolve it. They just add more signal to a direction that is getting harder to dismiss.

Smith put it plainly: specialization creates leverage, and men with new leverage do not do less, they raise the bar. Which means the real question is not whether the machine will take your trade. It is what remains valuable when execution gets cheaper. Spinning gets cheaper. Weaving gets cheaper. Basic joinery gets cheaper. What does not: knowing which goods the market wants next season, exercising judgment when the wool does not arrive, earning the trust of a buyer who cannot inspect the mill himself, defining quality before anyone else in the guild can. Those things compound.

The real reckoning is not I finished a week's cloth in two days. It is the identity crisis that follows. I built my life around this craft, and now a water frame and a child can do part of it. What am I actually worth? That feeling is the signal. If you have not felt it, you have not walked into a factory yet.

Go stand inside a cotton mill for an afternoon. Watch what the machine does. Not to admire the engineering. To find out what is left when it is done.

You do not need to outrun the bear. You just need to make sure you are not still standing still when it gets there.

Yours faithfully

This is how I feel when someone tells me they used ChatGPT (or the equivalent).

I’m bullish on AI. Deeply. Not because it’s perfect — it’s not, and neither are humans — but because we’re all apprentice craftsmen learning to hold a non-deterministic hammer. That’s the fun part.

But when you tell me you used it? I don’t know what to do with that information. That you wouldn’t have done this otherwise? That it might not be good? That I’m not worth the human effort?

The disclosure creates the doubt.

Hospitality isn’t about the quality of the cooking. It’s about not making your guests carry your insecurity.

And here’s the thing about cooking: you get better by doing it. Every meal teaches you something. But only if you own it. The apology is a way of opting out — distancing yourself from the thing you made before anyone can judge i…

Read more

Then it became necessary. Homework required it. Bills demanded it. The magic dulled into obligation.

We're in that window again, except with software. Previous tools made you think like an engineer. AI lets you think like a person with a problem.

In the last month I've built practice management software, a silly traffic monitor, workout trainer — not because I had to but because I could.

Do they need to exist? Does ice cream? You can just be selfish now.

Everything useful starts as a toy. The telephone. The automobile. The internet. Someone tinkering, not because they had to, but because they wondered what would happen if.

The window won't last. It never does. But right now we're playing.

Enjoy it before it becomes homework.

Read more